361Security
  • Intelligence
    • Blogs >
      • Paul Ashley
      • Brandon Scott >
        • Book
      • Haqmal
    • Analysis
    • Regions >
      • Global
      • Africa >
        • Kenya
        • Nigeria
        • Somalia
      • Asia >
        • Afghanistan
        • Myanmar (Burma)
        • India
        • North Korea
        • Pakistan
      • Europe >
        • Russia
      • Latin America >
        • Brazil
        • Colombia
        • El Salvador
        • Honduras
        • Mexico
        • Venezuela
      • Middle East >
        • Iran
        • Iraq
        • Jordan
        • Kuwait
        • Lebanon
        • Libya
        • Saudi Arabia
        • Syria
        • Turkey
        • Yemen
    • 'The First 300' Project
  • Services
    • US Government Services
    • Jobs Portal >
      • Leads
    • Shop
    • External Links
    • Consulting
    • Human Security
    • Development Nexus
    • Request For Information
    • Market Security
    • Key Leader Dossiers
    • Information Security
    • Literature Reviews
    • Cultural Intelligence
    • Research Resources
    • Forums (Beta)
    • Files
    • Security & Stability
    • Terrorist Profiles
  • Communications
    • About
    • Advertising
    • Public Affairs
    • Contributors >
      • Zachary Alpert
      • Paul Ashley
      • Michael Bassett
      • Ben Eden
      • Jeffrey Hawn
      • Nick Heras
      • Attila Laczko
      • Brandon Scott
      • Chris VanKirk
    • Mailing List

A Legion for the Country

9/12/2016

Comments

 
By Jeffrey Hawn
​
​‘The American military is becoming a Wal-Mart’, according to Rosa Brooks, law professor at Georgetown University and a Schwartz senior fellow at the New America Foundation and former counselor to the U.S. Defense Undersecretary for Policy from 2009 to 2011, in her recent article in Foreign Policy Magazine. More accurately, what Brooks meant was that American policy makers have increasingly regulated the American military to a one-stop shop for the world’s problems.
 
As Brooks noted, “At the Pentagon, you can buy a pair of new running shoes or order the Navy to search for Somali pirates. You can grab some Tylenol at CVS or send a team of Army medics to fight malaria in Chad. You can buy yourself a new cell phone or task the National Security Agency with monitoring a terrorist suspect’s text messages. You can purchase a small chocolate fighter jet or order up drone strikes in Yemen. You name it, the Pentagon supplies it. As retired Army Lt. Gen. Dave Barno once put it to me, the relentlessly expanding U.S. military has become ‘a Super Wal-Mart with everything under one roof.’”
 
The list of the military’s problems isn’t shrinking either. What’s more, it faces a cross roads in long-term strategic engagement. On the one hand, the US military faces rising conventional threats from China and Russia. On the other, the US is dealing with numerous, asymmetric radical jihadists, ethnic militias, the aforementioned pirates, and numerous fragile states, which are rapidly imploding. At a certain point, the military will have to ask itself is this split mission sustainable? Is it the military’s primary role to engage in long-term counterinsurgency nation-building conflicts, or should the military focus on growing conventional threats?
 
In all likelihood, the military will have to do both, but considering the fractious threat environment of the 21st century, it might be time to consider a shake up of the military itself. Specifically, it might be time for the US to consider creating a sixth branch of the military whose sole purpose is to fight small wars. Leaving the Army, Navy, Air Force, Coast Guard and Marines to focus on conventional threats. While the idea of a sixth branch may sound ludicrous, it is not with out precedent and in many ways is already in effect.
 
Historically, several European governments have maintained a regular army and a colonial one. While the regular army trained for battle against conventional European foes, colonial formations served overseas, policing European colonies. In practice, this meant fighting a series of small wars and skirmishes against a variety of local militias, tribes, and rebel groups, while also building infrastructure such as railroads.
 
One nation that took the notion of a colonial army and ran with it was France. The French Foreign Legion, though initially formed as a military unit comprised of foreign volunteers, went on to become one of the most feared and respected military units in the world. This was due in large part because the Legion was always at war, fighting constant skirmishes with the native population of Algiers, at the time a French colony, or serving as the spearhead of numerous French military expeditions.
 
The Legion’s effectiveness isn’t confined to the pages of history. The French Foreign Legion has been integral to numerous French missions in sub-Sahara Africa including Operation Serval. After the French Army executed what is still considered a textbook intervention in a civil war, the primary French combat arms including the Marines and Airborne withdrew, leaving behind a small flexible combat group to support the new UN mission and local army with an armed intervention brigade. The force was spearheaded by the 2e Régiment Étranger d'Infanterie of the Legion.
 
That’s not to say the Legion or the French for that matter have the silver bullet. Rather, following their withdraw from Vietnam and their decisive defeat at Dien Bien Phu, the French military dedicated itself to being a more agile force which fielded small, elite combat units that could provide an effective tactical multiplier. France maintains about 3,000 troops in Africa that serve just this purpose. In fact, if you were to look at a map of French military deployments across the continent, you’d be hard pressed to answer if the colonial era was over. Most of these French forces are small units that can rapidly apply force when needed. A good example of this ability was during the Ivory Coast civil war, when an elite French contingent broke the back of forces loyal to would-be dictator Laurent Gbagbo.
 
The US has already started to copy from the French playbook, using small contingents of elite solders, i.e. Marines and Special Operations troops backed by drones and airstrikes, to provide backbone and serve as force multipliers for indigenous forces. In the US’s case, this means Kurdish militias in both Iraq and Syria as well as reliable militias in Libya, and government troops throughout Africa and Asia.
 
However, while this light footprint intervention is proving militarily effective, it is consuming an inordinate amount of the nation’s military assets and stretching things a bit thin. Moreover, while inter service rivalries and bureaucratic infighting are significantly reduced post 9/11, it would be fallacy to think any large complex organization such as the US military is free of such things. Getting five distinct branches to share intelligence, plan missions, and execute operations can be a burdensome task.
 
It might then be time to resurrect the Legion of the United States. The original Legion of the United States served from 1792-1796 and was the precursor to the modern US Army. What made the US Legion unique was its combined arms force consisting of mixed units of infantry, cavalry, and artillery when it was the practice at the time for each of these branches to serve in separate regiments. The Legion was a force designed specifically for Indian fighting which is to say operating on the periphery of what at the time was considered civilization. The Legion needed to be nimble enough to maneuver against a foe who used hit and run tactics, while also versatile enough to stand up in a conventional fight should the enemy choose to engage it in one.
 
The Legions other great qualifier at the time was its focus on building the infrastructure necessary to secure ground newly cleared of hostile forces. In the 18th century this meant building roads and Forts. In the 21st century it means building roads, dams, and bridges while also training a local military and police force to operate independently and prevent insurgence or terrorist from gaining a foothold in previously secured territory. A modern US Legion could serve as the nation’s small wars branch of the military, by resurrecting this nimble combined arms and infrastructure building mentality.
 
Imagine if you will, a reasonably sized force 80,000-100,000 strong that could combine all the assets needed to wage a small war. A core unit of special operations troops, a couple of light battalions to set up forward operating bases, call in airstrikes, and co-ordinate artillery fire, and an air wing consisting of drones and a new class of cheap ground attack aircraft. This hypothetical ‘Legion’ would  also have units specializing in training of local forces, and engineering units who could simultaneously assist in combat operations, and execute the “hearts and minds” infrastructure development so needed in counterinsurgency and nation-building operations.
 
It isn’t much of a leap to see such a force being organized. In practical terms, it already exists. The aforementioned light footprint interventions being carried out in Libya, Iraq, Syria, and elsewhere, are being spearheaded by US Special Operations Command with input from Joint Special Operations Command and other US Commands. The actual combat components of these interventions are combined task force’s, which are supposedly temporary formations pool resources and personnel from all branches of the military. Considering that it is unlikely that the US will stop needing to fight small scale wars anytime soon, it may serve to formalize these task forces into permanent formations, allowing their personnel to specialize in their form of combat, while the rest of the armed forces can focus on more conventional missions.     
 
While policy gridlock and the divide of bureaucratic fiefdoms means the creation of a specialized small wars branch of the US military is unlikely, the fact remains that the US Armed Forces face a consistent drift in mission, being asked to do too much in too many different contexts. So perhaps it is time for the military to consider making the low intensity conflict area of its responsibilities a separate branch, rather than forcing each branch to split their resources between low intensity conflicts and their primary mission. The face of war is changing, and the US military needs to adapt in order to better face the multitude of threats that infest the world today.   
Comments
comments powered by Disqus

    Archives

    December 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    November 2023
    October 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    March 2023
    January 2023
    November 2022
    February 2019
    December 2018
    April 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    June 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011

    Categories

    All
    Afghanistan
    Africa
    Algeria
    Al Nusrah Front
    Al-Nusrah Front
    Al Qaeda
    Al Qaeda
    Al Shabaab
    Al-Shabaab
    Americas
    AMISOM
    Anarchists
    Ansar Al Sharia
    Ansar Al-Sharia
    Anti-Semitic
    AQAP
    AQIM
    Arab Spring
    Arab-spring
    Argentina
    Asia
    Asymmetrical Warfare
    Australia
    Austria
    Baghdad
    Bahrain
    Bangladesh
    Belgium
    Blackmarket
    Boko Haram
    Bomb
    Borneo
    Bosnia
    British
    Burundi
    Cairo
    Caliphate
    Cameroon
    Canada
    Car Bomb
    Cartels
    Caucasus
    Central-african-republic
    Chad
    Charity
    Chechen
    Chechnya
    Chile
    China
    Colombia
    Crime
    Crimea
    Cuba
    Czech
    Denmark
    Diaoyu
    Djibouti
    Drug Trafficking
    Dubai
    Egypt
    Elections
    Eln
    El-salvador
    Eta
    Ethiopia
    Europe
    Execution
    Explosives
    Farc
    Fatah
    Financing
    France
    Gas-attacks
    Gaza-strip
    Germany
    Global
    Golan-heights
    Great Britain
    Greece
    Guantanamo-bay
    Gulf Cooperation Council
    Hamas
    Haqqani
    Haqqani-network
    Hezballah
    Holland
    Hostage
    Human Trafficking
    Ied
    India
    Indonesia
    Inspire
    Insurgency
    Iran
    Iraq
    Ireland
    Isil
    Isis
    Islamic-revolutionary-guard
    Islamic State
    Islamist
    Israel
    Italy
    Japan
    Jeffrey Hawn
    Jerusalem
    Jihadist
    Jordan
    Kabul
    Kashmir
    Kenya
    KGB
    Kidnapped
    Kidnapping
    Kosovo
    Kurdistan
    Kuwait
    Latin America
    Latin America
    Lebanon
    Lej
    Let
    Libya
    London
    Los Zetas
    Maghreb
    Malaysia
    Mali
    Maoist
    Maritime
    Mauritania
    Mecca
    Mek
    Mend
    Mexico
    Middle East
    Milf
    Militants
    Militia
    Mogadishu
    Morocco
    Mortar-attack
    Muslim-brotherhood
    Myanmar
    Narcotics
    NATO
    Netherlands
    Niger
    Nigeria
    Northan Ireland
    North Korea
    Norway
    Nuclear
    Pakistan
    Palestine
    Peru
    Philippines
    Pij
    Pipe-bomb
    Pira
    Piracy
    Pirates
    Plf
    Plfi
    Poland
    Portugal
    Presidential-elections
    Propaganda
    Puntland
    Putin
    Qatar
    Quds-force-brigade
    Reconnaissance
    Rocket-attack
    Russia
    Sahrawi-republic
    Salafist
    Saudi Arabia
    Saudi Arabia
    Security
    Senegal
    Senkaku
    Serbia
    Shooting
    Sierra-leone
    Sinai
    Small Arms Proliferation
    Smuggling
    Somalia
    South-africa
    South-sudan
    Space
    Spain
    Spectacular
    Sri-lanka
    Strategic Defense
    Sudan
    Suicide Attack
    Switzerland
    Syria
    Tahrir
    Taliban
    Tanker
    Tanzania
    Terrorism
    Terrorists
    Terrorist Threat
    Thailand
    Threats
    Training
    Ttp
    Tuareg
    Tunisia
    Turkey
    Uae
    Uganda
    Ukraine
    UN
    United Kingdom
    United-nations
    United States
    Uvied
    Uyghur
    Vbied
    Vehicle-borne-ied
    Warfare
    Weapons
    West-bank
    Worldwide
    Yemen

    RSS Feed

© 2011 - 2024